Making Information Make Sense





< Back to List of Posts

InfoMatters

Category: Censorship / Topics: Censorship Culture Language Management Policy Social Movements Trends

Mobs and the Workplace

Submitted by Stu Johnson

Posted: July 212, 2020

"Cancel culture' needs to slow down…



globalvillagespace.com

Editor's Note: This morning, while reading the opinion page of our local paper, one column brought to mind the June 27 piece by Greg Asimakoupoulus, "About Those Monuments: Why attempts to revise history are risky…"  (which appeared on SeniorLifestyle.org). In a similar vein, Veronique De Rugy wrote about the current rush of "cancel culture" in her column, "When mobs, morality meet the markets." Following is an excerpt, with a link to the full column at the bottom of the page.


A wave of hasty firings is sweeping across the country, driven by demands from what some call the “cancel culture.”

The New York Times editorial page editor James Bennett ran an op-ed from Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, that displeased the paper’s readers and some colleagues, so he lost his job. The chief curator at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, Gary Garrels, lost his job, too, after he was accused of being a racist for saying he would still collect art from white men.

But the list of those who lost their jobs is much longer, and the rationale is sometimes as stunningly weak as someone liking the wrong tweet.

As a result, fear has gripped many workers: Any day, any worker can be fired for simply angering a Twitter mob.

Meanwhile, employers are left wondering how they should react when one of their employees becomes a target.

Every case is different, and employers should be able to dismiss workers. “Employment at will” remains the best labor policy. However, one piece of wisdom is worth following: During scary, emotional or angry times, don’t act hastily. Slow down.

There is value in not making rash decisions during stressful times.

This rule of not acting out of passion is central to our political system. James Madison, in “Federalist No. 10,” warns of impetuous mobs or factions “united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” As such, Madison and the Constitution’s other architects created a system of governance that discourages fast, immediate action and gratification.

The built-in slowdown requirement enshrined in the Constitution is also present in our legal system. Due process means that no stage of legal proceedings can be dispensed with, preventing government from acting too hastily.

Today, the wisdom that inspires our constitutional system and many other fields could help private firms when responding to the demands of an impetuous mob. . . .

© 2020, Creators

Read the full column


This article also appears on SeniorLifestyle.org, which Stu Johnson edits.


Posted: July 212, 2020   Accessed 2,549 times

Go to the list of most recent InfoMatters Blogs
Search InfoMatters (You can expand the search to the entire site)

`
Think about it...

Animation offers a medium of story telling and visual entertainment which can bring pleasure and information to people of all ages everywhere in the world.

Walt Disney

From our partner websites

< Back to List of Posts

InfoMatters

Category: Censorship / Topics: Censorship Culture Language Management Policy Social Movements Trends

Mobs and the Workplace

Submitted by Stu Johnson

Posted: July 212, 2020

"Cancel culture' needs to slow down…



globalvillagespace.com

Editor's Note: This morning, while reading the opinion page of our local paper, one column brought to mind the June 27 piece by Greg Asimakoupoulus, "About Those Monuments: Why attempts to revise history are risky…"  (which appeared on SeniorLifestyle.org). In a similar vein, Veronique De Rugy wrote about the current rush of "cancel culture" in her column, "When mobs, morality meet the markets." Following is an excerpt, with a link to the full column at the bottom of the page.


A wave of hasty firings is sweeping across the country, driven by demands from what some call the “cancel culture.”

The New York Times editorial page editor James Bennett ran an op-ed from Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, that displeased the paper’s readers and some colleagues, so he lost his job. The chief curator at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, Gary Garrels, lost his job, too, after he was accused of being a racist for saying he would still collect art from white men.

But the list of those who lost their jobs is much longer, and the rationale is sometimes as stunningly weak as someone liking the wrong tweet.

As a result, fear has gripped many workers: Any day, any worker can be fired for simply angering a Twitter mob.

Meanwhile, employers are left wondering how they should react when one of their employees becomes a target.

Every case is different, and employers should be able to dismiss workers. “Employment at will” remains the best labor policy. However, one piece of wisdom is worth following: During scary, emotional or angry times, don’t act hastily. Slow down.

There is value in not making rash decisions during stressful times.

This rule of not acting out of passion is central to our political system. James Madison, in “Federalist No. 10,” warns of impetuous mobs or factions “united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” As such, Madison and the Constitution’s other architects created a system of governance that discourages fast, immediate action and gratification.

The built-in slowdown requirement enshrined in the Constitution is also present in our legal system. Due process means that no stage of legal proceedings can be dispensed with, preventing government from acting too hastily.

Today, the wisdom that inspires our constitutional system and many other fields could help private firms when responding to the demands of an impetuous mob. . . .

© 2020, Creators

Read the full column


This article also appears on SeniorLifestyle.org, which Stu Johnson edits.


Posted: July 212, 2020   Accessed 2,550 times

Go to the list of most recent InfoMatters Blogs
Search InfoMatters (You can expand the search to the entire site)

`
< Back to List of Posts

InfoMatters

Category: Censorship / Topics: Censorship Culture Language Management Policy Social Movements Trends

Mobs and the Workplace

Submitted by Stu Johnson

Posted: July 212, 2020

"Cancel culture' needs to slow down…



globalvillagespace.com

Editor's Note: This morning, while reading the opinion page of our local paper, one column brought to mind the June 27 piece by Greg Asimakoupoulus, "About Those Monuments: Why attempts to revise history are risky…"  (which appeared on SeniorLifestyle.org). In a similar vein, Veronique De Rugy wrote about the current rush of "cancel culture" in her column, "When mobs, morality meet the markets." Following is an excerpt, with a link to the full column at the bottom of the page.


A wave of hasty firings is sweeping across the country, driven by demands from what some call the “cancel culture.”

The New York Times editorial page editor James Bennett ran an op-ed from Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, that displeased the paper’s readers and some colleagues, so he lost his job. The chief curator at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, Gary Garrels, lost his job, too, after he was accused of being a racist for saying he would still collect art from white men.

But the list of those who lost their jobs is much longer, and the rationale is sometimes as stunningly weak as someone liking the wrong tweet.

As a result, fear has gripped many workers: Any day, any worker can be fired for simply angering a Twitter mob.

Meanwhile, employers are left wondering how they should react when one of their employees becomes a target.

Every case is different, and employers should be able to dismiss workers. “Employment at will” remains the best labor policy. However, one piece of wisdom is worth following: During scary, emotional or angry times, don’t act hastily. Slow down.

There is value in not making rash decisions during stressful times.

This rule of not acting out of passion is central to our political system. James Madison, in “Federalist No. 10,” warns of impetuous mobs or factions “united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” As such, Madison and the Constitution’s other architects created a system of governance that discourages fast, immediate action and gratification.

The built-in slowdown requirement enshrined in the Constitution is also present in our legal system. Due process means that no stage of legal proceedings can be dispensed with, preventing government from acting too hastily.

Today, the wisdom that inspires our constitutional system and many other fields could help private firms when responding to the demands of an impetuous mob. . . .

© 2020, Creators

Read the full column


This article also appears on SeniorLifestyle.org, which Stu Johnson edits.


Posted: July 212, 2020   Accessed 2,551 times

Go to the list of most recent InfoMatters Blogs
Search InfoMatters (You can expand the search to the entire site)

`
Home | About | Religion in America | Resouce Center | Contact Us
©2024 Stuart Johnson & Associates
Home | About | Religion in America
Resouce Center |  Contact Us
©2024 Stuart Johnson & Associates